Verse explainer
A prayer that reaches joy not by denying devastation, but by naming every loss first — then choosing trust anyway.
Although the fig tree shall not blossom, neither shall fruit be in the vines; the labour of the olive shall fail, and the fields shall yield no meat; the flock shall be cut off from the fold, and there shall be no herd in the stalls:
BSBThough the fig tree does not bud and no fruit is on the vines, though the olive crop fails and the fields produce no food, though the sheep are cut off from the fold and no cattle are in the stalls,
The plain meaning
Verse 17 is deliberately incomplete. The prophet lists six agricultural catastrophes one after another — no figs, no grapes, no olives, no grain, no sheep, no cattle — stripping away every layer of the ancient economy before he turns to verse 18: "yet I will rejoice in the LORD." The structure is the point. Habakkuk doesn't reach joy by minimizing the crisis; he reaches it by cataloguing the ruin fully and then declaring that God remains when everything else is gone. The whole book has been wrestling with why God seems silent while injustice thrives. This verse is the culmination: even if the worst comes — total crop failure, total loss — Habakkuk's confidence is not in the harvest. Jamieson, Fausset & Brown put it plainly: those who enjoyed God in abundance can enjoy all in God when emptied. The "yet" of verse 18 only carries its weight because verse 17 has been completely honest about the cost.
The common misreading
What the commentators say
Clarke calls these two verses — 17 and 18 together — the finest display of resignation and confidence he had ever encountered. He stresses that Habakkuk saw the evil as real and unavoidable, yet his trust was unshaken because he knew the word of Jehovah could not fail. The desolation is painted in its full calamitous weight precisely so the faith that endures it is seen for what it is.
Gill reads the six losses as a comprehensive portrait of famine — every staple of ancient Israelite life stripped away in order. He also allows a figurative layer: fig trees, vines, and olives can represent fruitful believers, and fields without food can signify a famine of the Word. On either reading, the verse's function is to make the darkness as complete as possible, so the confession of verse 18 stands as genuine, costly faith.
JFB contrast those whose joy depends on "creature comforts" — which a stripped fig tree instantly destroys — with those who can sit atop the heap of ruined comforts and still rejoice in God. They note that Habakkuk begins his prayer with trembling (v. 2) and ends it with a song of triumph, citing Job 13:15 and Psalm 43:5 as parallel examples of faith outlasting despair.
The word behind it
"Fail" — used of the olive's labour in the KJV. The underlying Hebrew (and the related sense noted by JFB) carries the meaning "to lie" or "to disappoint the hope," as something that seemed to promise but did not deliver. It is the word of a betrayed expectation, not merely an absence. That nuance sharpens the verse: the olive didn't just fail to produce — it failed the people counting on it. The cumulative weight of six such disappointments is what makes the "yet" of verse 18 so hard-won.
Related verses